Month: January 2011

Richard Land keynote during CP Luncheon

Houston native Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission since 1988, will be the keynote speaker during the annual SBTC Cooperative Program Luncheon on March 1 at the Frisco Convention Center.

Musical guest will be Mary Jane Schwarz. Tickets are $10 and are available online at sbtexas.com/evangelism.
After growing up in Houston, Land earned an undergraduate degree with honors from Princeton University as well as New Orleans Seminary and Oxford (doctor of philosophy).

In his role leading Southern Baptists’ social concerns agency, Land has represented Southern Baptists and other evangelicals in the halls of Congress, before U.S. presidents, and in the media. He has served multiple terms under presidential appointment as a member of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom.

His latest book is “The Divided States of America? What Liberals and Conservatives are Missing in the God-and-Country Shouting Match!” published by Thomas Nelson.

The Cooperative Program Luncheon also recognizes churches that faithfully support the CP, Southern Baptists’ shared funding mechanism for worldwide gospel missions and ministry.

Sr. Adult Luncheon March 2

The annual SBTC Senior Adult Luncheon, noon on March 2 at the Embassy Suites Frisco Convention Center (across from the Dr. Pepper Arena), will feature the music of Jason Crabb and the comedy and inspiration of Sylvia Harney.

Tickets are $10 and are available at sbtexas.com/evangelism or by calling Karissa Muilenburg toll-free at 877-953-7282 (SBTC).

Harney has sifted a gold mine of true-life stories from her own life and doesn’t mind letting the world in on them. She has worked with such late legends Minnie Pearl, Red Skelton and Jerry Clower.

She is the author of “Married Beyond Recognition,” a humorous look at marriage, and “Every Time I Go Home I Break Out In Relatives.” She has also written six children’s books.

Crabb, longtime lead voice for The Crabb Family, was mentored by Bill Gaither and has performed at Carnegie Hall and The Grand Ole Opry. He launched a solo career in 2007.

La Iniciativa Hispana y Ministerios Étnicos

Queridos hermanos en la Fe:

Escribo estas palabras para animarlos a asistir, apoyar y orar por la Conferencia Anual para Evangelizar con Poder. Esta conferencia en español se celebrará en el Frisco Convention Center y Dr. Pepper Arena el día 27 y 28 de febrero de 2011. Este año tendremos dos oradores excelentes, el Rev. Josh Tapia y el Dr. Richard Vera.Los dos estarán con nosotros el domingo y el día lunes.

El rally que tendremos el día domingo 27 de febrero de 2011, empezará a las 6:00 PM en el Frisco Convention Center ubicado en 7601 Gaylord Pkwy en Frisco, TX.El lugar en donde nos reuniremos está directamente al lado del hotel Embassy Suites. Además, tendremos 8 talleres la mañana del 28 de febrero en el mismo lugar comenzando a las 8:30 AM hasta las 11:45 AM y una conferencia general que se tendrá a las 1:15 PM hasta las 4:00 PM.

Hermanos, queremos alcanzar a Texas para Cristo y sentir un gran despertamiento espiritual entre nuestro pueblo Hispano de la Convención Bautista del Sur. ¡Espero que así sea! ¡Alabado sea el Señor!

Southern prof calls for full-orbed mission, critiques popular strategies

The shortest path between two points is not a straight line, as conventional wisdom says, but a wrinkle. Think paper napkin, slightly crumpled.

It’s a metaphor a leading Christian missions agency leader used to describe the rapid multiplication methods needed to reach the last frontier of unevangelized people groups, as related by M. David Sills in his book “Reaching and Teaching: A Call to Great Commission Obedience.”

Sills is professor of Christian missions and cultural anthropology at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and a veteran missionary who served the SBC International Mission Board in Ecuador as a church planter and educator.

Sills’ book critiques such “need for speed” (thus the wrinkle) in what he views as a well-meaning but flawed missiology that is eschatologically dubious.

He argues for a full-orbed Great Commission missiology rooted in Matthew 28:18-20 to make disciples worldwide, baptizing them and teaching them all of Christ’s commands?a complex task as varied in difficulty and duration as the many cultures missionaries engage.

History and experience have shown, Sills writes, that a lack of adequate discipleship (teaching) by theologically grounded missionaries often leads to nominalism, syncretism or an outright return to paganism. He rightly lauds the urgency of gospel proclamation, but laments a trend toward quick-strike missions that leaves too much of the work to native peoples before, he contends, they are properly equipped.

Sills’ book is welcomed and overdue if the prevailing missionary culture is how he describes it, with long-held missiological tenets that involved years of plowing the proverbial hard soil supplanted by methods to “reach” (meaning 2 percent evangelized) every known people as quickly as possible so that Jesus may come back.

In perhaps the most important chapter, “Search versus Harvest Theology: Reaching or Teaching?” Sills argues that a biblical missiology doesn’t divide between “search” missions (preaching Christ to the unreached peoples) and “harvest” missions (harvesting among responsive people).

He writes: “It is a mistake to view harvest and search theologies as incompatible or mutually exclusive positions. God has called and equipped some missionaries to take the gospel to unreached, unengaged areas of the world, while He has called others to disciple, teach, organize disciples into churches, and establish schools and support ministries.”

Throughout the book, Sills mentions the IMB at various points, but never directly addresses the board’s strategies, preferring instead to speak in general terms about trends in evangelical missions culture. The reader is left to wonder if the IMB is partly in view in his critiques, but it seems apparent it is.

Sills summarizes how, beginning in the 1970s with a desire to identify unreached peoples, some mission groups began moving toward a greater emphasis on these “hidden peoples,” eventually leading to a formula for deciding which groups were “reached” or “unreached” based on whether or not 2 percent of the people were identified as evangelical.

The 2 percent figure was intended as an arbitrary marker for statistical purposes, Sills writes, and a much lower percentage than the business model from which it was borrowed that said if 20 percent of a culture adopted an idea, they had a sufficient base to propagate that idea. But some mission agencies took the 2 percent figure and adopted it as a benchmark for a strategy of engaging the unreached people groups.

“In most missions circles, it has become a ‘fact’ as widely accepted as the laws of physics that when a people group’s population is 2 percent evangelical, the missionaries can pass over them because they are considered reached,” Sills wrote.

ESCHATOLOGY & THE MISSION
In addition to repeated references to Matthew 28:18-20 and 2 Timothy 2:2 (Paul’s mandate to Timothy to train faithful men to teach others), Sills also interacts with the context of Matthew 24:14, which he says has become “the driving force of the missionary task” for many organizations.

The passage?”And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come”?is part of a discourse in which Jesus is urging his disciples to be patient and endure the coming afflictions in their time, not a strategy “to speed up the kingdom,” Sills argues.

“[Some mission agencies] further believe that Jesus cannot come back until we have finished this task,” he writes.

It is debated among conservative scholars, Sills writes, about whether Jesus is speaking of the end of the world or the end of the Jewish state and Jerusalem in the first century, noting Jerusalem’s destruction in A.D. 70. He adds that the Greek word used in the passage for “whole world” is oikoumene, which was also used in the New Testament by Paul to describe the world of the Roman Empire.

Sills asks, if such interpretations are correct that Jesus was speaking of the end of time, then what is considered “the gospel of the kingdom?” How may we determine if it has been thoroughly preached? And was Jesus promising to return immediately after the task was finished?

“Given the doctrinally unsound state of the church around the world where the need for speed has led missionaries to preach a simple gospel message through an interpreter, get a show of hands, call them a church, and move on, we should shudder to consider what the church would be like at the end of such a missions strategy,” he adds.

“What would become of the church should Jesus delay His return for fifty years? Or, five hundred years? How many heresies would creep into an untaught church?”

Sills goes on to address other relevant subjects such as church planting movements (CPMs), championed largely by the IMB, the need to re-emphasize theological training, and the challenges of reaching a world of 70 percent oral, mostly pre-literate peoples.

In addressing church planting movements, Southern Baptists will be encouraged to read that the IMB has written that “no rapid reproduction of churches can be contrived or manipulated by human ingenuity or programming. An explosive eruption of legitimate churches is the work of the Holy Spirit; but often takes years of patient planting until a rich harvest is reaped.”

Sills’ discussion of ecclesiology (“Your ecclesiology will drive your missiology”) is also helpful; he contrasts the New Testament requirements against tempting definitions of church that may pad numbers and affirm missionaries.

The book carries endorsements by SBC seminary presidents Daniel Akin of Southeastern and Al Mohler of Southern, as well as David Hesselgrave, professor emeritus of missions at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School.

Voters silenced: Sup. Court lets stand D.C. ‘gay marriage’ ruling

WASHINGTON (BP)–The U.S. Supreme Court handed traditional marriage supporters a disappointing loss Jan. 18, declining to take up a case in which the District of Columbia refused to allow citizens to vote on an initiative defining marriage as between one man and one woman.”Gay marriage” has been legal in the nation’s capital since March 2010, and a group of conservative leaders has wanted to gather signatures for an initiative that would define marriage in the traditional sense and overturn the law. But while the city’s charter allows voters to gather signatures for initiatives, the D.C. Board of Elections rejected all attempts at an initiative defining marriage, saying it would violate the city’s Human Rights Act and “authorize discrimination” against homosexuals. The charter is the city’s equivalent to a constitution.Then-Mayor Adrian Fenty signed the “gay marriage” legislation into law in 2009 after it passed the D.C. Council. Conservatives had hoped the Supreme Court would at least take up the case after a closely divided lower court, the D.C. Appeals Court, issued a 5-4 decision in July allowing the board of elections’ action to stand. But the Supreme Court, without comment, declined to take up the case, known as Jackson v. D.C. Board of Elections.The board’s actions have been particularly frustrating for D.C. conservatives who have watched citizens in other states — such as California and Maine — successfully place the issue on the ballot. Such an initiative defining marriage has never lost.The suit was brought by D.C.-area pastor Harry Jackson, former D.C. delegate Walter Fauntroy and others who were represented by attorneys for the Alliance Defense Fund and StandforMarriageDC.com. A January 2010 Washington Post poll found that 59 percent of residents — including 70 percent of the city’s black citizens — believed the “issue should be put on a city-wide ballot.””In America, we respect the right to vote. That right is explicitly protected by the D.C. Charter, but the government has succeeded for now in suppressing the voice of D.C. citizens,” said Austin R. Nimocks, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. “We had hoped the U.S. Supreme Court would restore this guaranteed right in the district. … We will remain diligent in looking for other legal opportunities to protect and defend the right of all D.C. residents to have their voices heard as the D.C. Charter clearly intended.”The four justices who dissented in the July D.C. Appeals Court decision said they sympathized with “gay marriage” supporters but felt the D.C. Council — which has authority over the Board of Elections — “exceeded its authority.””If the Council’s powers are as broad as they assert, what is to preclude the Council from imposing additional subject matter limitations on the right of initiative or, indeed, from extinguishing that right altogether?” Chief Judge Eric Washington asked in the dissent. “It appears that a candid answer to that question would be ‘nothing.’ Yet, under our ‘constitutional’ principles, a Charter right may not be limited or extinguished by ordinary legislation. That may be done only by going through the intentionally-cumbersome process of amending the Charter.”Barrett Duke, vice president for public policy of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, told Baptist Press last year that controversy should serve as a warning against the “incremental strategy” used by homosexual activists. “The [D.C. Appeals Court] based its decision on the District of Columbia’s Human Rights Act, which bars discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and other factors,” Duke said. “The act itself, of course, never mentions that it could be applied to same-sex marriage. It was originally promoted and is written as if it applies solely to such things as employment and housing discrimination. But the radical homosexual activists knew that the language of the act could be applied to other homosexual agenda issues as well.”Duke added, “What happened in D.C. should serve as a reminder to people across the country that the agenda of the radical homosexual movement is to force on the American public complete acceptance of homosexuality and that it is committed to achieving that goal through slow incremental progress that hides the full extent of its motives until it is too late.””Gay marriage” is legal in D.C. and five states: Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Vermont and Iowa. –30–Michael Foust is associate editor of Baptist Press. The Southern Baptist Convention has a ministry to homosexuals. Find more information at www.sbcthewayout.com.

Study: Contraceptives raise abortion rate

MADRID, Spain (BP)–A newly published study in Spain shows increased use of contraceptives did not result in a decrease in abortions.The report in the January issue of the medical journal Contraception showed contraceptive use in women of childbearing age rose by 30 percent — 49.1 percent to 79.9 percent — from 1997 to 2007. The rate of elective abortions, however, more than doubled from 5.52 to 11.49 per 1,000 women.The results fly in the face of the conventional wisdom espoused that greater use of contraceptives reduces the abortion rate.The study authors offered some possible explanations for this apparent incongruity, including improved abortion reporting, but said in conclusion, “The reasons for the increasing rate of elective abortion warrant further investigation.”Pro-lifer Christina Dunigan wrote about the results at her blog RealChoice: “Researchers scratched their heads in bewilderment, likely because they don’t understand risk compensation. If you reduce the perceived risks of a behavior, people will compensate by behaving in higher-risk ways.She added, “The Pill Pushers have chosen to ignore the data, and the reality of how human beings work. The more you create an environment in which people perceive sex as low-risk, the more people will engage in risky sex.”–30–Compiled by Tom Strode, Washington bureau chief for Baptist Press.

‘Saint Death’ cult making inroads across US border

LAREDO—They call her “La Santa Muerte,” the Saint of Death, and her followers have multiplied rapidly over the last decade as violence has gripped Mexico and spilled across the border, say missionaries who have witnessed the death cult’s growing influence.

From Mexico City to border towns such as Laredo, and lately in large American cities such as Houston, Dallas, Los Angeles and Chicago, her cloaked, skeletal icon, usually depicted gripping the Grim Reaper’s scythe, is often seen hanging from the windows, entryways and sometimes on the tattoos of her disciples.

Her appeal lies in basic human desires, especially appealing to the poor and to drug runners, who entreat her for protection and vengeance.

“Healing, money, protection, or they want power,” explained Orpha Ortega, who along with her husband, William, serves as a Southern Baptist missionary in Mexico City.

Santa Muerte is a growing concern for Christian pastors in border towns such as Laredo, where a meeting last month hosted by Southern Baptist missionaries drew Spanish-speaking pastors, church leaders and at least one concerned police officer, whose experiences at a local jail prompted him to attend. (Spanish-language video of the meeting is accessible at sbtexas.com/videos.)

The death cult figures prominently in the surging violence by Mexican drug traffickers, known as narcos, in interior Mexico and along the U.S.-Mexico border, William Ortega told those at the meeting.

The Ortegas have ministered for six of the 12 years they’ve been in Mexico City in the Tepito neighborhood—notorious for its thriving black market. Poverty, drugs and violence are pervasive and the largest shrine to Saint Death is an institution there.

Of 28 million people in Mexico City, about 2 million are estimated to be followers of Saint Death, Ortega said, with large numbers of them in Tepito.

Last week, the Ortegas welcomed the news that Mexican authorities had arrested the leader of that Tepito shrine and the closest thing the cult has to a high priest, David Romo, on kidnapping and money laundering charges, according to multiple news accounts.

Increasingly, the death cult has moved north, making inroads into border towns and American cities where Mexican immigrants find work.

Ortega said adherents are largely two groups: drug dealers and the poor, with the former seeking protection from authorities and vengeance on their enemies and the latter seeking healing, protection from the violence around them, and prosperity. The death saint, her followers claim, offers all of the above.

A Baptist worker in the Laredo area told the TEXAN he hears testimonies of healing from cancer, AIDS and other ailments at the hands of Saint Death.

“But most of the time, their promise of healing or protection involves the killing of someone else in order to receive a miracle or in order to receive a protection,” he said.

That was one of the points Ortega emphasized during the Laredo meeting. In the Texas border town and across the Rio Grande in Nuevo Laredo is the largest number of Saint Death followers along the Rio Grande, Ortega said.

Often, Christians are seen as enemies of the cult for their winning converts and refusing to syncretize orthodox Christianity with the death cult.

Although the Mexican government officially removed Santa Muerte from its list of recognized religions in 2005 and the Roman Catholic church has deemed it a pagan cult, many of its adherents are said to mix their Catholicism with Santa Muerte practices, the missionaries said.

With its authority in mostly oral tradition and its roots in ancient Aztec and Mayan death gods, the cult easily spreads its message through folklore. Worship practices include the placing of rum, flowers, or candy at the feet of a Santa Muerte altar, begging her favor in exchange for her favorite gifts.

In Mexico City, the Ortegas have had success in some areas planting churches and winning converts, but they said in Tepito, some of the churches don’t last long “because they are weak Christians and it is hard for them to grow with all of the opposition around them.”

“You can go there [to Tepito] and give them a tract and they will read it, but it’s almost like fighting against Satan himself,” Orpha Ortega said. “It’s a real battle there.

“We still have not been harmed and are grateful to God for that. So continue praying for us to be strong and be brave. And for other people for God to open their eyes.”

In some border towns, where many of her followers are either tied to drug cartels or are seeking protection from them, the rise of the death cult has created obstacles to the gospel.

“It’s affecting a lot,” said one missionary working along the border. “First of all, they teach their followers they cannot talk to us. We are Christian, we are their enemies, they are taught. Secondly, they try to attack us in different ways. As a missionary here, they have threatened me, written notes. I’ve been on their watch list. It is spiritual warfare.”

On the Texas side of the border, the missionary was quick to note that short-term missionary volunteers are relatively safe. “It is a problem for us because we are encountering them on a daily, long-term basis.”

“Pray for safety while I’m doing the work,” the missionary implored those who would read his interview. “Pray for my integrity and holiness. Pray the Lord will provide the right leaders to provide churches. The only way we will win the fight is to plant those churches that preach the truth.”

Bruno Molina, SBTC ministry associate for language evangelism, said the death cult “is a challenge to the gospel not only in Mexico, but increasingly beyond the U.S border area into other areas of Texas. The very name of its representative organization, roughly translated as ‘The Traditional Church of Mexico-USA,’ implies that they do not see themselves as just a Mexican ‘religious’ phenomenon but that they lay claim to the U.S. as part of their cultic turf.”

“They claim 1.5 million adherents here in the U.S. and, due to our shared border with Mexico, many of them necessarily reside in Texas,” Molina added. “This is evident not only in our jails, but also in Texas front yards that display Santa Muerte figures, cars and pick-up trucks decorated with Santa Muerte decals, and people who are tattooed with Santa Muerte figures. The Santa Muerte cult is virulently anti-Christian in that it promotes devotion to someone, namely Saint Death, other than God through Jesus Christ.

“Our evangelism department is committed to exposing this challenge to the gospel and working with our pastors to equip their church members to meet this challenge.”

Former Planned Parenthood director publishes her story

BRYAN  All of her good intentions had suddenly become mere excuses, hollow arguments with no ring of truth. What Abby Johnson had believed and what she had based her life’s work upon for the past eight years unraveled before her as she realized the gut-wrenching truth–she had believed and perpetuated a lie.

“unPlanned: The dramatic true story of a former Planned Parenthood leader’s eye-opening journey across the life line,” is Johnson’s account of her experience as an abortion clinic volunteer-turned-director and the life-altering event that put her at odds with her former employer. The book, a collaboration of Tyndale House Publishers, Focus on the Family, and Ignatius Press, went on sale Jan. 11.

Johnson promoted her new book Jan. 10 in an audio webcast co-hosted by pro-life advocates David Bereit and Shawn Carney.

The relationship between the three had once been adversarial as Johnson led the work of the Bryan-College Station Planned Parenthood clinic and Carney and Bereit struggled to thwart her “success” at a nearby pregnancy resource center.

It was the idea of success that began to nag Johnson and chip away at her faith in and advocacy of Planned Parenthood. In the webcast, Johnson repeatedly noted that although she was never wholly comfortable with abortion (her clinic offered abortions every other Saturday), she justified her work because she believed Planned Parenthood’s rhetoric about women’s health and the ravages of illegal abortions. And, she said, the organization touted the goal of reducing abortions through the proliferation of contraceptives.

But Johnson knew from her own experiences that couldn’t be true. In her book, Johnson confesses to having had two abortions. Both pregnancies occurred while she was using contraceptives. During her time as a Planned Parenthood volunteer counselor Johnson discovered her situation was not unique. Most of the women she counseled for abortions had also been using contraceptives and they, like her, felt like failures.

“On the inside I was still feeling like I had failed as a woman. My body had failed me. God had failed me. Why did he allow this to happen to me? It didn’t make sense,” she said.

But she pressed on. She had to have it make sense. She had to see the justification in abortion.

“It’s always about that justification,” she said.

Johnson continued to volunteer at the clinic, then later was employed there.

“Here I was now twice contracepting and twice having these unplanned pregnancies and then twice having abortions. It just didn’t make any sense. What is happening here? What is going on? It didn’t seem like our goal of expanding the use of contraception was really reducing the number of abortions. But if that is their mission?and it has been their mission for so long?it has to be right. This has to be right. It makes sense on paper. It makes sense when I say it. It has to make sense.”

Years later, as clinic director, Johnson learned the business side of the non-profit organization. It began to look less like a grassroots group of altruistic volunteers determined to give women quality health care and more like a capital venture. The profits came not on the philanthropy of serving low-income communities and college students but on lucrative abortions. The organization reported making just over $1 billion dollars in fiscal year 2006-2007.

When Johnson was asked by regional directors to reduce the distribution of free services and products and increase the number of monthly cervical and medically induced abortions, she said she was stunned.

“What they wanted to do was they wanted us to increase the quota of abortions we were providing. They also wanted to start offering medication abortions–the RU486–many times during the week,” she said.

What disturbed her as much as the demand for increased abortions was that the medicated abortions would include no consultation from a physician. Johnson’s second abortion in 2003 had been medically induced and she described it as “one of the worst experiences in my life. I’ve never experienced anything that terrible, physically and emotionally.”

The bottom line was making money, not the benevolent assistance of women in crisis.

“I thought we were a non-profit,” Johnson recalled saying at management meetings.

The response?

“Non-profit is a tax status, not a business status,” she was told.

“Now that I was in management I was beginning to see what the real intentions were,” she said.

Eight years earlier, as a self-described pro-life college junior at Texas A&M University, Johnson said she had volunteered for the non-profit organization because, despite the abortions, they provided free or reduced-cost health care for women. Planned Parenthood portrayed women as victims. If abortions were not kept legal, Johnson was told–and soon believed–thousands of women would die each year of “back street” abortions. Repeatedly, she was assured that one of Planned Parenthood’s goals was to reduce the number of abortions.

As a young woman, Johnson said she was convinced she was pro-life but admitted during the webcast that she would have lost any debate on the abortion issue.

“I was really pretty easily hooked in,” said Johnson, who grew up in a Southern Baptist home.

Johnson details in the book how someone from her background could end up being the director of an abortion clinic. She believed in the non-abortion work of the clinic and, because of her own abortion experiences, convinced herself there was a need for abortions for women facing unplanned pregnancies.

In her last year with the clinic she was having more difficulty justifying her work. But it was not until an afternoon in September 2009 that Johnson came face to face with the reality of abortion. It would no longer be a simple matter of numbers on paper, a discussion in a management meeting.

Never had she been called into the procedure room to help with an abortion (In the past she had been in the room to hold the hand and give counsel to patients during the process). But on this day the visiting abortionist was performing an ultrasound-guided abortion, an unprecedented procedure in her clinic. Johnson would witness–in real time–the life of a 13-week-old baby taken. She held the ultrasound probe on the woman’s abdomen so the doctor could see the baby and the cannula as he did his work. The procedure was visible on a monitor.

The shock of witnessing an abortion in progress made Johnson question everything she had believed and advocated about the work of Planned Parenthood.

In her book, Johnson recalled thinking, “I had believed a lie! I had blindly promoted the ‘company line’ for so long. Why? Why hadn’t I searched out the truth for myself? Why had I closed my ears to the arguments I’d heard? Oh, dear God, what had I done?”

Two weeks later she resigned her position as director of the clinic and walked to the offices of Shawn Carney of the Coalition for Life.

When Planned Parenthood’s attempts to woo her back to her position with enticements of more money failed, the billion-dollar organization filed an injunction against Johnson and Carney. The national organization argued that the suit was necessary in order to protect patient privacy.

Johnson contends the suit was an effort to silence her and intimidate other Planned Parenthood volunteers and employees from doing likewise.

Planned Parenthood lost their lawsuit, freeing Johnson to write her book with Cindy Lambert.

Bereit admitted that he was surprised when he received a text message from Carney stating that Abby Johnson was in his office. She wanted to leave her work at the abortion clinic. Bereit and Carney had prayed years for that.

“God does these things,” Bereit said during the webcast.

It was in God’s timing that she left the abortion industry, Johnson said. God worked through the compassionate prayers and actions of those who adamantly opposed her work but who showed her Christ’s love. She said she hopes to encourage others in the same manner to follow in her footsteps.

Special-needs ministries open doors for outreach

A ministry for special-needs kids not only meets the needs of children, it’s an outreach opportunity for the entire family, said Will Hall, a Southern Baptist layman who has a 12-year-old son with Down syndrome. Research shows that about 95 percent of families with special-needs children are unchurched.

Most churches already have the resources needed for such a ministry, Hall said, although they may not realize it. For example, a church member may have a degree in special education and may even be looking for a way to serve the church.

“I think every church may find that they have this kind of talent, people with these kinds of experiences and these kinds of professional qualifications who are looking for the opportunity to apply what they do in their professional life in a ministerial setting,” Hall said.

“I also think that it’s a good opportunity to reach out to communities in terms of seeing who has these abilities at schools?in the public school system or local colleges,” he said. “In seeking their professional insights, we may be able to reach them with the gospel. It’s kind of a double ministry when you’re looking to start this kind of program.”

Hall began a Sunday School class for two autistic siblings at College Heights Baptist Church in Gallatin, Tenn.

“We hope that there will be more than two, but we’ve started out trying to reach out to these two children whose mother has been attending our church,” Hall said. “They have severe learning disabilities. They’re not very communicative in terms of verbalization.”

Hall was inspired to work with the kids when he realized the impact others had on his son, Jacob.

“With Jacob I’ve always anticipated and prepared for the fact that he may one day be able to discern right from wrong and make choices about sin and also be able to accept or reject Christ,” Hall said. “My wife and I do all that we can to teach him at home, but it’s a welcome help to have a church that is trying to assist us in teaching him so that if he is able, he will make the right choice. I thought the same thing for these two children.”

Since August, Hall and a handful of rotating volunteers have been teaching the two Nigerian children a simple yet foundational truth through sign language: “God made me.”

“We worked with them several weeks in a row and then their mother was working with them at home, and one Sunday they both came in excitedly and they couldn’t wait to show us ‘God made me,'” Hall said.

Repetition is vital to teaching special-needs kids, Hall said, and these particular children are sensory-oriented. As they learned about creation and repeated the phrase “God made me,” they used cookie cutters and Play-doh to make representations of God’s creation.

Next the children learned to sign “Jesus loves me,” and Hall arranged for the two kids to sign those words during the chorus of the song as part of the church’s children’s Christmas program.

“It’s a delight to see the progress they’ve made in just a few months from where they were almost totally isolated from us,” Hall said. “When we shared with the mother about our plans to use them in the children’s Christmas program, she was just overwhelmed. She was tearfully happy.”

For churches considering starting a special-needs ministry, LeAnne Williams, ministry assistant in the SBTC Church Ministries department, suggested addressing the unique needs of parenting a special-needs child.

Williams recommended the book, “Special Needs, Special Ministry” by Jim Pierson, Louise Tucker Jones, and Pat Verbal, which addresses some of the most pressing needs and concerns of these special families:

  • Grief
  • Safety and survival
  • Sleep and rest
  • Marriage enrichment
  • Providing for children even after their own death

And because the needs of these families are varied, Williams suggested incorporating specific attitudes into the ministry such as: unconditional love and grace, acceptance, hospitality, and respect. Likewise, ministry actions should focus on celebration and worship, fellowship, flexibility, and encouragement, she said.

Williams said ministering to special-needs families can be as simple as:

  • asking them about their family and then listening
  • assisting in connecting families with resources
  • providing parents opportunities to do ministry without concern for their children
  • being available
  • providing financial support

But Williams also suggested ministry participants avoid the following pitfalls when ministering to special-needs families:

  • visiting without permission
  • telling parents you know how they feel
  • offering answers
  • putting them on a pedestal

Time invested in a special-needs ministry has eternal implications, Hall said.

“These children have a special relationship with God. I know that may sound like I’m making a theological stretch, but I’ve seen it in my own son and I see it in them,” he said. “They delight in the simple knowledge of ‘God made me.’ It’s a powerful concept that I think sometimes as adults we don’t appreciate. He intentionally made you and me.

“I know that Jacob delights at the knowledge that ‘Jesus loves me.’ In fact, his favorite thing to do around church now?he loves babies. He’ll go up to babies and he likes to do two things. He likes to play peep-eye with them and the other thing is that he’ll look at them and sign ‘Jesus loves babies.’

“I didn’t ever articulate to him that Jesus loves babies. He made the connection. That’s a powerful affirmation to me that God is speaking to him,” Hall said.

For more information about ministering to families and children with special needs, contact LeAnne Williams at lwilliams@sbtexas.com or 877-953-7282 (SBTC).

Recommendations cited in this article are drawn from the aforementioned book by Breeding, Hood and Whitworth, as well as “Special Needs Smart Pages” by Joni & Friends Ministries, and “Special Needs: Special Ministry for Children’s Ministry” from Group Publishing, as well as interviews with parents of special-needs children.

Adoption, fostering was obvious call

Editor’s note: The observance of Sanctity of Human Life Sunday is Jan. 23. This article focuses on adoption and orphan care, which for many people is an inseparable issue from the decades-long debate over legal abortion in the United States. In November, SBTC messengers passed a resolution calling Christians to greater involvement in adoption and orphan care, citing more than 40 Scripture passages that speak of caring for the fatherless.

For most families, the decision to adopt or foster children is preceded by months or years of prayerful consideration. In the case of two Southern Baptist couples in Texas, it took only a matter of hours to respond to desperate situations of homeless children.

“I got a call at work from the police department telling me to come and pick up my 1-year-old relative or he would be taken to foster care until they sorted out the details of a domestic dispute,” recalled Amanda Kennedy of Euless. She and her husband David had been praying God would bless them with a child, but did not expect the answer to come through adoption.

The home from which Amanda rescued Ethan was littered with drug paraphernalia, dirty diapers and dishes covered in mold. Within weeks the Kennedys were named foster parents. “Money was very tight and we were getting no assistance from the state, Ethan's birth parents or anybody else. Work was tough because I now had the responsibilities of a mom—literally overnight.”

That responsibility was compounded when Ethan was hospitalized for eight days to treat a drug-resistant staph infection. “Hospitals require that children under the age of 8 be supervised by a parent or guardian at all times and I was his only guardian,” Amanda explained. Soon she found herself unemployed, having lost her job as an apartment-leasing agent while caring for Ethan.

“The Lord is the only one who saw me through this,” she added. “A month after losing my job, he gave me a job in the ministry and blessed David with a better job. Ethan ended up getting Medicaid and we were able to qualify for a hardship grant that covered his child care and clothing for three months.”

After seeing God provide for his family, David professed faith in Christ during a tent revival service at North Euless Baptist Church. “He said that seeing the Lord's hand work in our family through the chaos and uncertainty of our lives, he couldn't help but give his life to Christ,” Amanda remembered.

Ethan's parents eventually relinquished their rights with the Kennedys' request for adoption, which was finalized 18 months after responding to the call from police.

“It was all worth it and we would do it again and again if we needed to,” Amanda said.

Dayna Nichols of Bryan also received a call in the night from a CPS worker seeking to place two brothers in foster care.

“How can we say, 'No?' Just say, 'Yes,' and we'll figure out the rest as we go along,” answered her husband Matt Nichols, who was away on a trip to Haiti.

“There are so many families that are qualified to be foster parents or even adoptive parents. Try to imagine what would happen if our churches became places where people who were having trouble would come for help with kids? There would be no need for depending on the government to take care of our orphans,” Matt said.

While Dayna describes herself as a list-maker who first considers her options, there was no time for planning in this situation, she said. “We simply were willing and we stepped out in faith.”

The 3- and 8-year-old brothers have since returned to live with their mother, but the Nichols remain involved in a ministry with which Central Baptist Church of Bryan began partnering last year. At least a half-dozen families who attended an informational luncheon on adoption last fall will have the opportunity to complete training this spring offered by Arrow Child & Family Services of Spring.

Other churches affiliated with the Southern Baptists of Texas Convention are partnering with Arrow to assist families interested in adoption, including Bannockburn Baptist Church in Austin, Church at the Cross in Grapevine, Hallmark Baptist Church in Fort Worth and Walnut Ridge Baptist Church in Mansfield.

“As a congregation that has placed a high priority on family ministry, we believe we have a special calling to assist those children in our culture who lack the benefits of home life,” stated Bannockburn's senior pastor, Ryan Rush.

Central's mission pastor, Mark Strazincky, visited with leaders from Arrow last summer and was impressed by their desire to help local churches “stand up and meet the needs of the orphans in our own communities.”

Messengers to the 2010 annual meeting of SBTC called on families to consider whether God may be calling them to provide foster care or adopt, and asked pastors and church leaders to continue efforts to preach and teach on God's concern for orphans and commend ministries that provide financial resources to families desiring to adopt.

“The why is obvious,” said Dayna Nichols. “You just need to ask yourself how, when, who, and then be obedient.”

In addition to ministries such as Arrow, the SBTC has two affiliated ministries that assist families seeking to foster or adopt children—Texas Baptist Home for Children in Waxahachie (tbhc.org) and East Texas Baptist Family Ministry (etbfm.org) in Timpson.

– Emily Crutcher, TEXAN correspondent, contributed to this article.