Month: February 2020

“Sonic the Hedgehog” delivers a solid message about friendship

Sonic is an energetic blue hedgehog born with extraordinary powers. He’s fast — 300 mph fast. 

He can play table tennis by himself. He can race through a highway speed tramp without being seen.

He’s so fast that few people in his hometown of Green Hills, Mont., know he even exists.  

But one day, Sonic’s speed gets him in trouble. 

While playing baseball on an empty field, Sonic becomes discouraged that he has no friends. Sure — he can pitch to himself and hit a deep shot to the outfield and race around the bases — but he has no friends to give him a high five at home plate.

“I really am alone. All alone. Forever,” he says.

Angry and sad, Sonic races around the bases so many times he causes an energy surge that knocks out the power — not only in his town but elsewhere, too. Fearing terrorism, the U.S. government sends a brilliant (but evil) scientist, the eccentric Dr. Ivo Robotnik, to the scene for an investigation.   

Soon, Dr. Robotnik uncovers a footprint of a creature he’s never seen. It’s from Sonic.

Will our speedy friend live to see another day?

The live-action/CGI movie Sonic the Hedgehog (PG) opens this weekend, starring Ben Schwartz (Parks and Recreation, DuckTales) as the voice of Sonic, Jim Carrey (Mr. Popper’s Penguins) as Robotnik, and James Marsden (X-Men, Enchanted) as Sheriff Tom Wachowski. It’s based on the Sega video game franchise. 

The movie follows Sonic as he befriends Sheriff Wachowski, who himself joins the most-wanted list because of his partnership with an alleged terrorist. Sonic’s goal is to escape Earth (and Robotnik) and travel to another planet through the use of his magical golden rings, which he and the sheriff accidentally misplaced. Once he finds them — they’re in San Francisco — he’ll supposedly be safe. 

Sonic the Hedgehog is an entertaining film targeting families, although it contains a few elements that will trouble some parents. That’s the bad news. The good news: Its messages about friendship and contentment are ones any family can embrace.  

Warning: minor/moderate spoilers!

(Scale key: none, minimal, moderate, extreme) 

Violence/Disturbing

Moderate. Sonic the Hedgehog has more punches to the face than typically seen in a children’s movie. Wachowski punches Robotnik. Sonic enters a bar where a fight breaks out and we see at least a dozen punches land. (Sonic creatively ends the fight with his super-quick speed.) Robotnik pursues Sonic and Wachowski, obviously trying to kill them. His drones shoot lasers, causing multiple explosions. 

Sexuality/Sensuality/Nudity

Minimal. Wachowski jokes about being on a “yacht with Rihanna.” We see Wachowski and his wife share a brief kiss once or twice. His wife jokes about him having a dating app on his phone. (He doesn’t have one, and she was relaying a concern from her sister.) We hear a joke that someone has “taken a lover.” 

Coarse Language

Minimal. OMG (5), h-lla (1), h-ll (1). Also: butt (2), fart (2), sucks (1), gosh (1), jerk (1), stupid (1), heck (1). One literal “OMG.” Most of the bad/inappropriate language is spoken by Dr. Ivo Robotnik, but Sonic himself does say one “OMG.” 

Other Stuff You Might Want To Know

Wachowski’s sister-in-law doesn’t like him and suggests they get a “D-I-V-O-R-C-E.” We hear the phrase “drug dealer.” We see plenty of beer at the bar. A woman tosses her beer into Wachowski’s face.  

Life Lessons

Learn to be content: Sheriff Wachowski’s goal in life is to escape the small town and work in San Francisco, where he can prove himself. But through his friendship with Sonic, he realizes how blessed he is to work in Green Hills, where everyone respects him.

Everyone needs a friend: At its core, Sonic is a movie about friendship. Sonic needs one. Wachowski — who is married but has no children — has the time to be one. (See Worldview/Application, below.)  

Worldview/Application

The animated world has its share of movies that are entertaining-but-pointless. Thankfully, Sonic the Hedgehog isn’t in that group. 

Yes, Sonic is a fun film about an aster-than-lightning hedgehog, but it’s also a film about a lonely hedgehog who needs a friend. 

He even places “make a real friend” on his bucket list. 

The Bible, of course, addresses the subject of friendship. In the Old Testament, God gave Adam a companion because it was not “good that the man should be alone.” In the New Testament, Christ established the church, which is to meet regularly and “encourage one another and build one another up” (1 Thessalonians 5:11). 

God made us social creatures. 

But Sonic does more than encourage us to get friends. Its primary message is to be a friend to others — something Sheriff Tom Wachowski does for Sonic. He places his desires second. He sacrifices his time for someone in need. In the end, they become good friends. That’s a good messages for children and adults.  

Sponsors

Jack in the Box, Puma, Foot Locker, Books-A-Million, Valpak, Bimbo, 2nd and Charles. 

Final Verdict

Sonic is a fun movie that leaves you scratching your head and asking: Why did they put that in there? Whether it’s the bar scene fight or the language or the jokes about a divorce, it’s stuff that should have been left on the cutting room floor. 

Discussion Questions

1. Have you ever felt lonely and needed a friend?

2. What does it require to be someone’s friend? Is God calling you to befriend someone in need?

3. What does the Bible say about friendship? What is the difference between a “good” friend and a “bad” friend? How do we distinguish the difference? 

Entertainment rating: 4 out of 5 stars. Family-friendly rating: 4 out of 5 stars.

Rated PG for action, some violence, rude humor and brief mild language. 

Concerns raised over SBC Pastors” Conference lineup

Orlando, Florida—Some SBC pastors and leaders have expressed concerns after an initial lineup of speakers was announced for the 2020 SBC Pastors’ Conference in Orlando, Florida.

According to a Feb. 10 announcement on the Pastors’ Conference website, sbcpc.net, speakers include Wayne Cordeiro, pastor of New Hope Christian Fellowship, a Honolulu, Hawaii-based church of the Pentecostal denomination International Church of the Foursquare Gospel, and Hosanna Wong, an associate teaching pastor at EastLake Church in San Diego.

In the hours after the announcement, various concerns were raised on social media. On Feb. 11, David Uth, 2020 Pastors’ Conference president and pastor of First Baptist Orlando, Florida, told Baptist Press, “I feel like [the speakers] have a message for us. I feel like God wants to speak to us through them. So my goal and my hope was that we could hear their message, we could learn from them, and we could embrace it.”

Mike Stone, pastor of Emmanuel Baptist Church in Blackshear, Georgia, and current chairman of the SBC Executive Committee, told the TEXAN, “Southern Baptists have spoken clearly through the BF&M about female pastors. The inclusion of a female pastor is in direct contradiction to our own doctrinal statement and has been officially for 20 years. There are other concerns but this one garnered the most attention.”

“That’s not to say that all program personalities should be required to be Southern Baptists,” Stone said. “The conference president has a right to invite whomever he pleases. But Southern Baptists also have a right to respond personally and organizationally in keeping with their conscience and convictions.”

Uth told Baptist Press that Wong is “not preaching. She’s not coming as a preacher. She’s coming as a musical artist.”

According to Baptist Press, Uth noted that only 9 percent of conference speakers will be non-Southern Baptist, including Wong, Cordeiro, and Jim Cymbala, pastor of Brooklyn Tabernacle in Brooklyn, New York. The Pastors’ Conference website listed 12 speakers at publishing time, suggesting another 21-22 speakers yet to be announced.

In written comments to the TEXAN, Uth said that, “We are taking into account the input received, both positive and negative, regarding the program for the SBCPC.”

“Each participant was invited to deliver or present a specific message or element of worship,” Uth said. “Every aspect of the program aligns with our overall theme and with our desire to encourage our pastors. I have no desire to bring anyone into an environment that is not welcoming to them. I am communicating with our invited program guests and together we are determining the best plan going forward for each.”

Uth noted, “A few have bemoaned SBC funds being used for this event. As an elected volunteer in this role of Pastor’s Conference president …  I have the unenviable task of raising the hundreds of thousands it costs to actually produce the event. That includes $100,000 we reimburse to the Executive Committee of the SBC for the use of the space for our four sessions.”

Both the North American Mission Board and the International Mission Board are listed as sponsors according to sbcpc.net.

NAMB has “a great deal of respect for David Uth and intend[s] to fully support the Pastors’ Conference,” said executive director of public relations Mike Ebert, in written comments to the TEXAN.

The International Mission Board declined to comment for this story.

As Southern Baptists prepare to head to Orlando in June, Stone said “This matter has been a needless distraction, including the way some have handled themselves on social media. But still, I think there is wisdom in withdrawing the more troubling invitations. ”

“I would encourage program personalities to not use the conference to take ‘shots’ at the SBC,” Stone said. “The issue here is not a narrow minded convention. Pastors don’t need to be rebuked because they expressed disagreement on this matter.”

“Dr. Uth is a godly, capable leader so I am confident he will respond prayerfully under the Lord’s direction,” Stone said.

Uth told the TEXAN, “We will soon be releasing additional details about the program that we hope will help clarify our reasoning on the program participants. In the meantime, please pray for us as we continue to hear, know and do the will of the Father.”

—With additional reporting by Diana Chandler at Baptist Press.

Small, rural church gives generously to mission causes throughout the year

REKLAW, Texas—“Generous” is the word that comes to mind when Jerry Bennett describes the church he has pastored for the past eight years. Reklaw Baptist is situated in East Texas just north of Rusk and southeast of Jacksonville. And yet the ministry of the rural church in a town of about 400 people extends beyond their own community to around the world through faithful giving to missions.

“Our church is very generous and I’m sure that was a part of the former pastor’s teaching,” Bennett said. Until a few years ago, the church followed the pattern of giving to North American missions around Easter and international missions in December. “About three years ago the consensus was to make it a year-round offering, so we talk about our missions offerings from January through December.”

“We use the video resources, the literature and the prayer guides,” Bennett said in describing the way the church keeps members informed of opportunities to give to mission causes. “We also like for people to see real live missionaries,” he added, recalling presentations from former missionaries to Romania as well as a young man preparing to go to Africa.

“Our people need that exposure to see where their money goes.”

Most of the folks who are members of Reklaw Baptist are retired, coming out of blue collar jobs. “I don’t hear people saying that we just asked them to give to the Gideons and now the Crisis Pregnancy Center,” Bennett said. “We have widows giving off of their social security and some who are still working full time. They’re giving generously.”

That attitude carries over to the children who attend as they fill baby bottles with coins for the ministry in Jacksonville to women faced with an unexpected pregnancy as well as contests between boys and girls during Vacation Bible School that yield $200 for missions.

The church’s secretary and treasurer related the faithfulness to giving that is demonstrated by a congregation that averages 35 people in attendance.

“We are not a very big church in size, but we have giving, loyal members,” shared Carolyn Martin in offering a report to the Southern Baptists of Texas Convention’s missions office. 

“We give each month to SBTC and we collect our missions offering throughout the year,” she noted. “We highlight Annie Armstrong, Lottie Moon, and Reach Texas throughout the year to remind our members to give towards the mission offering.

Referring to 2018 records, Martin said $4,186 was given to the Cooperative Program while the $782 given to missions offerings was distributed equally to international, North American and state mission causes.

After receiving Martin’s note, SBTC Missions and Church Planting Director Doug Hixson said it reminded him of the sacrificial giving of so many SBTC churches. “Their faithful giving is one piece of the huge puzzle we see that makes up the picture of the Cooperative Program.”

Hixson added, “We truly are better together and we are a part of a bigger picture. I am thankful for these churches that continue to make the CP work.”

International Missions in Our Own Backyard

Marhabaan! Salam! Hola! NÇ_x0090_ hÇŽo! It’s Tuesday night at Southcliff Baptist Church in southern Fort Worth and the church is teeming with activity. Languages from Mandarin Chinese and Persian to Arabic and Spanish fly through the air as the crowd gathers to learn English together at the church’s English as a Second Language (ESL) ministry.

On an average Tuesday night, the church hosts over 200 students from all over the world—from children to adults.

ESL at Southcliff has come a long way since it began 20 years ago. “We had three teachers, seven or eight students from Bosnia, one from Guatemala and one from China,” said John Spear, director of the ESL program at Southcliff. Today over 50 volunteers converge each week to provide games and crafts for the kids, activities for youth, formal classes for adults, and even a light meal that fosters connection and community for people who might otherwise be left alienated and isolated in their new homeland. Most importantly, the ministry provides an introduction to the love of Christ in action.

And that is what it’s all about. Southcliff’s ESL program was the first of ten HOPE Literacy sites that now operate throughout Tarrant County. HOPE Literacy is a nonprofit that helps churches fight illiteracy, poverty and isolation by establishing classes that teach language and literacy with the love of Christ. “Southcliff’s HOPE Literacy site demonstrates the power of ESL ministry to connect people to Jesus and one another,” said Harry Wilson, executive director of HOPE Literacy.

Stu Cocanougher, share pastor at Southcliff Baptist, pointed out that most of those volunteers are retirees and empty-nesters. “It’s also exciting to see our volunteers go beyond being a teacher and inviting the students to their home, celebrating birthdays. Sometimes they host baby showers, and take them to doctor’s appointments,” he said. “Our volunteers start the relationship with ESL—teacher/student—and then they begin just loving these people. And what is best is when the people from non-Christian backgrounds decide to put their faith in Christ.”

Eighty-eight-year-old Ron Higgins has been helping out since the ministry began two decades ago. “My gift is evangelism,” he said. He loves to share what a difference Christ can make in a person’s life, but there is nothing abrasive in his approach. “When I begin to share the gospel with someone, I tell them to stop me if they don’t want to hear it,” he said. However, in all his years of sharing the message of Christ’s love for all peoples of the world, he said, “I have never been asked to stop.”

“How amazing that God brought all the nations to Fort Worth,” said Paige Lister, who runs the children’s ESL program at Southcliff. “You don’t even need a passport or an airplane ticket” to become a missionary to the nations.

Contact SBTC Missions or HOPE Literacy for help with ESL ministry for your church.

Black church worship: A historical and theological interpretation of a people who were pressed, perplexed, and persecuted

I am often asked by white congregants if the church is moving toward unity and oneness in Christ Jesus, and if our convention (SBTC) has moved positively toward the “Look Like Heaven” emphasis. What is the reason for the emphasis on the black church and black worship in the month of February?

First, black worship is connected with black life and it is characterized by a religious sense inseparable from the suffering that determined it. When black people gather together for worship and praise to God, it is not because they have made a decision about the theological merits of Luther’s 95 Theses or of Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion.

Second, black worship has been wrought out of the experience of slavery, lynching, ghettos and police brutality. As my deceased father would preach speaking in terms of our pain, “… we have been ‘buked and scorned” and “talked about–sho’s you borned.” In worship, we try to say something about ourselves other than what has been said about us in society. Through sermons, prayers and songs,  we have transcended societal humiliation and degradation to explore heavenly mysteries about starry crowns, long white robes and gospel shoes on golden streets.

For us, the church has been the citadel of hope–a sanctuary of peace. Whereas the church has been the only place where we could go with tears in our eyes without anyone asking, “What are you crying about?” We preach, shout and sing the songs of Zion according to the rhythm of the pain and the joy of life WITHOUT being subjected to the dehumanizing observations of intellectuals such as sociologists, psychologists and theologians.

In worship we can be who we are as defined by our struggle rather than be defined by modern society. Furthermore, our gathering for worship has been dictated by a historical and theological necessity that is related to the dialectic of oppression, and our attempt to liberate ourselves from it—for which we would have no reason to sing, “How I go over, my soul looks back and wonders how I got over …”

Third, black worship was born in slavery on slave ships and nurtured in the cotton fields of Alabama, Louisiana, Arkansas, Texas, Georgia and Mississippi. It was birthed out of the struggle of black slaves seeking to define their humanity according to their anticipated freedom, and not according to slavery. For slaves, there was present the divine dower of “D Lawd,” who was greater than the white structures that enslaved them. When black slaves were tempted to give up in despair, this power (D Lawd) gave them hope that slavery would soon come to an end.

The source which black people used for explaining this power was the Holy Scripture as interpreted by our African heritage and our desire for freedom. Black worship is biblical! One of the most amazing facts of history is that many black slaves could not read, but their hermeneutics was not derived from an intellectual encounter with the text, but from a gift of the Holy Spirit.

Because slaves were able to make a radical epistemological distinction between the gospel of Jesus and the religion of the whites, the slaves came to a different theological conclusion about God. When African slaves heard of the Old Testament story of the Hebrew slaves in Egypt, they identified themselves with the Hebrews and their white slaves masters as the Egyptians—and for them no  exegesis could change that. It is this theological certainty that enabled them to sing, “… Oh Mary, don’t you weep, oh Martha don’t you moan, Pharaoh’s army got drownded in the Red Sea; Oh Mary, don’t you weep, oh Martha don’t you moan.”

Therefore, the theme of God as the liberator is found throughout the history of black religion. The theological conviction that the God of the Bible is the liberator of the poor and the downtrodden was and is the mindset of black people even today. For us as black people, God is a mighty God, our heartfixer, our mind regulator. In our worship he is known by the presence of his divine Spirit with us, giving us not only a vision that society must be transformed, but also giving us the power and courage to participate in that transformation.

Finally, black worship is a series of recitals of what God has done to bring his people out of hurt, harm and danger. In black worship, God is that divine miracle who enables his people to survive amid wretched conditions. In black worship, God is holy, personal and all-powerful. Our understanding of that fact is what drives us to sing, shout and preach, “He walks with me and talks with me and tells me that I am his own.” In black worship, God is everything we need in order to triumph over terrible circumstances.

But wait! You cannot leave out Jesus of black worship! In the black church, Jesus is known for his identification with the poor—and there is NO distinction in essence between God and Jesus. Jesus is our constant companion, the one who walks with his people. He is the oppressed one who experiences the brokenness of humanity.

Now that you have a better insight and meaning of the black church worship experience, my dear beloved brothers and sisters in Christ, I invite you for one Sunday in the month of February to go worship with your local SBTC black church and experience our unique heritage of praising our Lord!  

Editor’s Note: Pastor Donald G. Burgs, Jr. is the president of the SBTC African-American Fellowship and has submitted this column as the nation commemorates Black History Month.

REVIEW: “Created Equal” reveals a Clarence Thomas driven by faith

He was a self-identified left-wing college radical who wore Army fatigues. He embraced Marxist leaders and took part in a violent protest. And when he graduated from law school in the 1970s, he thought working for a Republican would be “repulsive.” 

But somehow, Clarence Thomas grew up to become one of the most conservative justices in the modern history of the U.S. Supreme Court.

A new documentary—Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words (PG-13)—tells the amazing story of Thomas’ life through the voice of Thomas himself. Based on 30-plus hours of interviews with Thomas, it follows this transformative figure, from his childhood, to his college and young adult years, to his unforgettable confirmation battle of 1991.

The film is the inside story of the most “silent” justice in Supreme Court history—he famously never asks questions—and it is as gripping as it is entertaining. 

At times, it’s even surprising.

Thomas grew up in the segregated southern city of Savannah, Ga., initially living with his mother in a run-down house where sewage flooded into yards. (It filled the ditches, and they used a plank to walk over the smelly mess.) He then moved in with his middle-class grandmother and grandfather, who sent him to Catholic school. This is where faith was ingrained into Thomas. His grandfather had a “philosophy of life” that came from the Bible, believing the world was fallen because of what happened in the Garden of Eden.

A few months shy of his 16th birthday, Thomas decided he wanted to be a priest. He entered seminary—“I loved the contemplative life”—but was troubled by the racism of a handful of classmates. (One passed him a note in class reading, “I like Martin Luther King … dead.” When news broke of King’s assassination, a classmate exclaimed, “Good.”) The Catholic Church, he says, did not take a firm stance on civil rights. So, he dropped out.

His next stop was Holy Cross, which he entered in 1968 during a tumultuous era in U.S. history. Thomas quickly embraced this radicalism by wearing Army fatigues and aligning himself with radical groups and leaders. Yet after he took part in a violent protest on another college campus, he felt guilty. He stopped in front of a chapel and prayed to God, “If you take anger out of my heart, I’ll never hate again.”

Thomas graduated from Yale Law School as a registered Democrat, but his only job offer was working with Republican Missouri Attorney General John Danforth. He considered the idea “repulsive,” but nevertheless took the job. That’s where Thomas’ outlook on life began to transform. In 1979 he took a position as a legislative aide to Danforth, who had been elected to the U.S. Senate. In 1980, Thomas voted for Ronald Reagan, a Republican. He then accepted a position within the Reagan administration. (He was attracted to Reagan’s push to stop the “social engineering” of the 1960s and 70s.)

Thomas’ judicial philosophy was influenced by his study of slavery and segregation in the U.S. — and why a nation founded on equality could have permitted both. He was searching, he says, for a set of legal ideals that said slavery and segregation were wrong. He discovered natural law, which he says was embedded in the Declaration of Independence’s statement that “all Men are created equal” and “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.”

“The framers understood natural law and natural rights a certain way, and it is an underpinning of our Declaration, which then becomes a foundation for the Constitution,” Thomas says. “They start with the rights of the individual, and where [do] those rights come from? They come from God. They’re transcendent.”

His personal views about a law, he says, don’t matter. 

“When interpreting constitutional text, the goal is to discern the most likely public understanding of a particular provision when it was adopted. … A bad policy can be constitutional. A good policy can be unconstitutional. So that’s why we start with a text.”

Thomas’ faith is a major theme in the documentary. During his contentious 1991 confirmation hearing—he was facing allegations of sexual harassment he denied—he and his wife held a Bible study with friends. The subject: Paul’s admonition to wear the “armor of God.” (His wife says of the allegations, “It felt like the demons were loose.”) Minutes before Thomas went before the Senate committee to respond to the allegations, Danforth told him, “Go in the name of the Holy Ghost.” Thomas labeled the committee’s handling of the allegations a “high-tech lynching.” “God,” he told the senators, “is my judge.” 

Thomas also answers those who mock and ridicule him for not aligning himself with positions historically held by black groups. He calls such mocking “stereotypes draped in sanctimony and self-congratulation.”

“If you criticize a black person who is more liberal, then you’re racist,” he says, “whereas you can do whatever to me, or to now Ben Carson, and that’s fine, because, ‘You’re not really black because you’re not doing what we expect black people to do.’”

The Supreme Court often is often viewed as mysterious, partially because cameras aren’t allowed in the courtroom. And Thomas—because he rarely speaks during the sessions—perhaps is the most misunderstood member of the court. 

Created Equal gives us a fascinating peek into Thomas’ life. Just like other recent films about the justices—RBG and On the Basis of Sex come to mind—it’s worth watching.   

Content warnings: The film includes brief footage of Anita Hill’s sexually explicit testimony—footage that earned it a PG-13 rating. Coarse language includes d–n (4), misuse of “G-d (3) and SOB (1). Most of the language involves Thomas quoting someone else. 

Rated PG-13 for thematic elements including some sexual references. 

Visit JusticeThomasMovie.com for a listing of theaters. 

Entertainment rating: 4 out of 5 stars. Family-friendly rating: 3 out of 5 stars.

Is the SBC Returning to Theological Liberalism?

So you’re upset with the “liberal direction of the SBC?” You’ve heard talk of leaders endorsing homosexuality. You’ve seen social media posts about Resolution #9 on Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality. You’ve interacted with blog postings about the #MeToo and #ChurchToo movements. Just reading the words “social justice” or “gospel issue” evokes emotions from deep within you—maybe positive, maybe negative. 

Are we headed toward theological liberalism or are we finally waking up from a season of ethnocentric and misogynistic comatose? Are we denying our roots and veering off track or are we finally opening our eyes to real issues? What’s the story in the SBC today, really?

We live in the age of information, where opinions and facts are craftily entwined then readily circulated on social media platforms. The truth is in there somewhere, but is not always easily distinguishable. Some disheartened pastors and churches feel their only recourse is to pull out of the convention altogether. But there’s something I think we seem to be forgetting… 

You are the convention.

The Southern Baptist Convention is not a parachurch organization with a top-down org chart. The SBC is a fellowship of autonomous churches whose decision-making power is vested in the collective body. The churches make the decisions, bringing their voices to the table at every annual meeting. They collectively decide on their leadership, resolutions, doctrinal parameters, governing structure, etc.

Much debate has arisen over some decisions made at the 2019 SBC Annual Meeting in Birmingham. But in fact, only 7 percent of SBC churches sent messengers to the 2019 annual meeting. The SBC 2019 annual meeting shows us a voting majority’s opinion from 7 percent of SBC churches.

Run Resolution #9 through this filter, just for example. I was there and estimate it passed by a margin of maybe 10 percent but we’ll say 15 percent to be sure. So 65 percent of 7 percent of our churches passed Resolution #9—that’s 4.55 percent of the SBC. Do the majority of SBC churches support Resolution #9? We can’t know based on the voting at the 2019 annual meeting. No one can really say if the SBC is going liberal or not. The good news is you are the SBC. Regardless of today’s buzz, you can influence the narrative moving forward.

Here are three ways your church can become part of the positive future narrative of the SBC:

1. Give sacrificially and regularly through the Cooperative Program. The Southern Baptists of Texas Convention’s constitution allows for 10 messengers from every affiliated church, regardless of CP participation. The SBC’s allows two messengers from every affiliated church, plus one more for every $6,000 (or 1 percent of the church’s budget) given, up to 12 maximum. SBC giving is measured from the end of September of the previous year. If you want to have a voice in the direction of the SBC, make a continual, sacrificial financial investment in the ministry of the SBC.

2. Set aside money for your leaders to attend national and state annual meetings. The vast majority of SBC churches run 150 or fewer in worship. In my experience, these churches may feel like convention decisions are not representative of their convictions. But they often don’t participate in the decision-making processes of the convention. I know their pastors are getting by on a slim salary, and their budgets are strained in every way, every year (this is the kind of church I pastored). But if the direction of the SBC is important to your church you need to send messengers to the annual meeting every year. Add a convention expense allocation to your leaders’ salary packages. Or add a convention expense line item to the church budget to cover travel costs for elected messengers from the church body. Don’t be frustrated with the direction of the convention while not making provision for having a voice in that direction. Churches of this size are not “small” in the SBC. They are normative.

3. Send a full slate of messengers to every annual meeting. Call a business meeting and elect as many messengers as your church is allowed, plus 2-5 alternates. Preregister them on the annual meeting website. Pray over them before they leave and hear a report from them when they return. If you are going to have ownership in the narrative of the SBC, you must have representatives in the decision-making processes of the SBC. Send messengers who will vote your church’s convictions. Send them all. 

The SBC is still the most theologically conservative, effective mission-giving and mission-sending mechanism on earth. We are a family of churches, and every family member has a voice. I encourage you to stop just speaking about the SBC and start speaking into the SBC. I wonder how the Southern Baptist Convention might be different if half of our churches sent messengers. Or 75 percent. Or 100 percent. Until we have more voices speaking into the decision-making processes, we will not have accurate conversations about the decisions being made in our processes.

Is the SBC headed back toward theological liberalism? Impossible to say right now. But your church’s voice can impact the present direction. Come to the SBC annual meeting this year. I’ll see you there.