I’ve enjoyed watching the planets meander across the sky over the past weeks. They are startlingly bright and I look forward to seeing the alignment of Saturn and Jupiter on December 21. Some have made the natural connection between the star of Bethlehem and this rare planetary alignment. It makes sense that people would do that, since the event will occur four days before Christmas, but it’s wrong. I completely agree with Steve Gollmer of Cedarville University in his recent comments in Baptist Press, saying that it’s bad astronomy and bad interpretation of Scripture to associate the two celestial events. But I think there’s a more basic misunderstanding going on here. 

We would love it if more people believed what we believe about God. That’s why I’ve heard (and likely taught a few times) that many of the biblical miracles are plausible, based on what science has discovered in recent years. That’s why I have heard stories about men who survived after being in the belly of a whale, and that some fish, groupers I think, grow large enough so that a man could actually fit whole in their bellies. Therefore, Jonah’s testimony is more believable. Have you heard that? It was the kind of thing that we taught college and high school students back in the day. 

Now understand that we did not teach that the water-into-wine miracle was actually just water poured into pots that had not had the wine rinsed out of them, that the multiplying of the loaves and fishes was a miracle of teaching people to share their “hide out” lunches, or that Jesus only appeared to walk on the water; we weren’t liberals who could not believe the biblical miracles. But we were eager to show that our faith is sensible, that we aren’t ignorant fundamentalists. 

Here’s the deal, again crediting Dr. Gollmer: the star of Bethlehem did not act like a normal heavenly body. This star led the wise men to the very house where Jesus and his family were living. A star can lead you generally north but it can’t lead you to particular town or address. At least a normal star cannot do that. If you’ll think about Jonah maybe you remember the last verse of chapter one, which tells us that the LORD prepared, or “appointed,” a big fish to swallow Jonah. It doesn’t bother me at all if someone says, “That is believable because some fish are that big anyway.” But neither does it bother me to find that such a thing is impossible, like a virgin birth is impossible, or a day when the earth stops its rotation for a while is impossible. 

I’ve known well-meaning people who doubt every miracle in the Bible except the Resurrection. That’s a little like the way we used to teach students that Jesus straight up raised Lazarus from the dead but the star in Matthew 2 just might have been a natural phenomenon that God used for his purpose. 

Surely you hear how silly that sounds. I believe that God made me, gave me this breath and raised a man from the dead who would never die again, a king who will return bodily riding a white horse; but I have some trouble believing that God prepared a particular star to behave like no other star ever? 

These are not just extraordinary events, like an alignment of planets. They are signs; they have meaning; they are supposed to make us pause for a minute in wonder. The astrologers from the east who came to Bethlehem seeking a king were not amateurs. Such men knew that sometimes two, or even three, planets align and make a show in the sky. Maybe they had seen such phenomena themselves and maybe they’d heard about it from their teachers. What they saw when Jesus was born was a sign, something that moved them to head west with precious gifts – more than an extraordinary happening, a unique one. God intended it to be unique and impressive as he did with the healing of the blind and the raising of the dead in the Gospels. These signs were like a trumpet that silences a crowd so they can hear a message from the king, exactly like that. 

It’s a great gift that God has given us minds, curiosity and encouragement to know his creation better as the years roll on. I love that we can see billions of miles into the universe through telescopes. I am deeply moved to see a recognizable, unique human face in the womb through a 3-D ultrasound. But I don’t think we’ll ever discover anything that makes the star of Bethlehem mundane. 

Standing before something only God could do, we are all wise men headed west and shepherds gaping at the baby Messiah. How wonderful! 

WASHINGTON (BP)  A new agenda proposed to the incoming administration of President-elect Joe Biden by the country’s leading gay and transgender rights organization poses a serious threat to religious freedom, especially that of Christian colleges and universities, Southern Baptist leaders have warned.

The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) – America’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer or questioning (LGBTQ) civil rights organization – issued Nov. 11 a document of more than 85 policy recommendations, all that can be implemented by the new administration without congressional approval.

HRC’s proposals offer “serious challenges to religious liberty, a biblical understanding of human sexuality, and ultimately the common good of our society,” two writers for the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Commission (ERLC) said in a Nov. 25 article.

R. Albert Mohler Jr., president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Ky., said in a Nov. 18 post HRC’s “Blueprint for Positive Change 2020” includes “perhaps some of the most alarming demands that threaten religious liberty.”

Both articles cited as especially menacing a recommendation to the Department of Education regarding accreditation of religious colleges and universities that HRC said “discriminate or that do not meet science-based curricula standards.”

In the proposal, HRC called for the department to issue a rule that makes clear a provision that “requires accreditation agencies to ‘respect the stated mission’ of religious institutions, does not require the accreditation of religious institutions that do not meet neutral accreditation standards including nondiscrimination policies and scientific curriculum requirements.”

Writing at the ERLC’s website, Casey Hough and Josh Wester said the proposed policy for the Department of Education “is nothing but a thinly veiled attack on religious colleges and universities that refuse to bow the knee to the sexual revolution.”

Hough is the lead pastor of Copperfield Church in Houston, Texas, and Wester is the ERLC’s chair of research in Christian ethics.

The HRC blueprint is a call for a Biden administration to reverse some of the policies implemented since 2017 under President Donald Trump, whose White House acted to roll back various regulations issued by President Barack Obama’s administration.

Mohler called the recommendation regarding school accreditation an “atomic bomb.”

HRC is urging the Biden administration “to deny accreditation – or, at the very least, to [facilitate] the denial of accreditation – to Christian institutions, Christian colleges and universities, and, for that matter, any other religious institution or school that does not meet the demands of the LGBTQ orthodoxy,” he said. “This would mean abandoning biblical standards for teaching, hiring, admissions, housing, and student life. It would mean that Christian schools are no longer Christian.”

Such a policy goes beyond efforts to deprive religious institutions “that will not surrender to the LGBTQ movement” of federal funding and student aid, Mohler said.

Colleges and universities that lose accreditation, he wrote, “would not be permitted to participate in the GI Bill; students would not be allowed to transfer their credits nor would they be allowed to apply for graduate study at other institutions.”

The HRC recommendation “is an undisguised attempt to shut down any semblance of a Christian college or university that would possess the audacity to operate from a Christian worldview,” Mohler said.

HRC’s recommendations to Biden also included:

The consistent implementation throughout all federal agencies of the Supreme Court’s decision in June that found non-discrimination protections in federal workplace law cover “sexual orientation” and “gender identity.”

The appointment of openly LGBTQ Supreme Court justices, federal judges, ambassadors and other executive branch officials.

The repeal of the prohibition on people who identify as transgender from serving in the military.

The establishment of an inter-agency working group to combat violence against individuals identifying as transgender.

A ban on the provision of conversion therapy, which it describes as a “fraudulent business practice.”

The formation of a multi-agency working group to guard LGBTQ rights internationally.

Writing for the ERLC, Hough and Wester said, “It is difficult to imagine a presentation of gender and sexuality that is more at odds with the biblical understanding of these issues than that within the HRC’s blueprint.  … [I]t is impossible to reconcile a Christian worldview with many of these policy initiatives.”

Christians should be the first to show love to LGBTQ people, but “love for [LGBTQ] people cannot include the affirmation of a lifestyle that is contrary to God’s will for his creation,” they wrote.

“Ultimately, the policies in the HRC document that promote the LGBTQ lifestyle will not result in more flourishing – neither for individuals nor society,” Hough and Wester said. “Instead, they will result in restrictions on religious liberty and the promotion of sexual identities that are both contrary to God’s will and harmful to those who adopt them.

Upon the agenda’s release, HRC President Alphonso David described Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris as “pro-equality champions.”

“The Biden-Harris administration has the opportunity to not only put our democracy back on track but deliver real positive change for LGBTQ people’s daily lives,” David said in a written statement.

The 24-page, HRC agenda is available at https://hrc-prod-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/Blueprint-2020.pdf?mtime=20201110185320&focal=none.

NORTHERN AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST—Drew Carson* has a hard time believing it’s been 10 years since the Arab Spring started on the western side of Northern Africa and swept all the way across the Middle East.

Part of that, he said, is because not much has changed since those fiery first few months of the region’s thawra, or “revolution” in Arabic—it feels a bit like the picture stood still. When Tunisian citizen Mohamed Bouazizi lit himself on fire in December 2010 in protest of high unemployment, government corruption and a lack of opportunities, he started a movement, and the unlikely happened—the government fell. The idea spread to Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Syria and Bahrain. But then things stopped.

If it was a “spring,” Carson said, it didn’t feel much like it. At the beginning, the swell of people’s protests unseated rulers in some countries and started civil wars in others, but the fresh future the people had looked for never came. 

Instead, they settled into a new kind of suffering. Syria is still riddled with bullet holes and bombed-out buildings, its people huddled by the millions in nearby countries and scattered across Europe and the world. Lebanon, which took on a massive load of refugees, got another hit recently when a giant, deadly explosion in the capital city of Beirut left hundreds of thousands homeless.  

And Yemen is still facing “one of the world’s worst disasters in all of history,” said Carson, a former longtime Christian leader in the area. The fight for control of the government there has caused a massive humanitarian crisis. UNICEF calls it a “living hell” for Yemeni children—hundreds of thousands are “acutely malnourished and fighting for their lives.”

And Tunisia, the country where it all began, has had more than 10 governments since the Arab Spring started. 

“A Tunisian man came in the barbershop where I was getting my hair cut the other day and he just kept talking about the corruption back in his country, the fact that there’s no stability there,” said Carson, who now lives in the United States. “His opinion is like many others from that area—‘I don’t like the way the world is right now; I can’t trust it.’”

That sentiment seems frozen in time, the same as a decade ago, but Carson feels the passing of time in other ways. He feels it in the dozens of haircuts he’s logged at the Iraqi barbershop since he moved back to the U.S., and he sees it in the fact that his barber and the Tunisian man are in his city at all.

“We certainly have a larger Arab diaspora out there than there has been in their whole history,” he said. 

Carson also sees “remaking” in other areas, like the possibility of Syrian refugees encountering the gospel as they make their way into other countries (see related story), or new freedoms that have come in some ways because of the Arab Spring.

One of those has shown up in work like that of Andrew and Courtney Dobson*, Christian workers who before the Arab Spring had a hard time knowing how long they’d get to stay in the country where they lived. For years, others around them had been kicked out without warning.

But as the government changed in their country, changes in the law forced them to rethink their reason for being there. That spurred them to start a new kind of business—one that puts them in contact with a lot of local people who have never heard the gospel.

“It has given us access to hundreds and hundreds of people,” Andrew Dobson said. “We’ve found ways to be a lot more productive and have a lot more relationships than we did before.”

Courtney Dobson said it’s been a “big encouragement” to them and that they’ve also been able to have teams in areas they never have before as a result of the changes. As they’ve had more relationships, more people have been willing to read the Bible and engage with them than ever before.

The Dobsons are praying that will turn into a “spring” of people finding new life in Christ, people who are now very aware that the revolution didn’t bring them the freedom they had hoped for.

“We’ve heard many people say, ‘We thought this was going to be better, but we are worse off than we were before,’” Courtney Dobson said. “They say things like, ‘Nothing really changed, nothing got better, all those people died for nothing.’ It’s hard to hear and see them feel that kind of hopelessness.”

Carson agreed, saying that when he looks at the Middle East, his heart breaks.

“I love these people. I certainly want them all to come to Christ,” he said. “I see them broken. I see them stretched on every side. I see families who have lost and lost and lost and lost and spiraled down.”

He said it’s hard to know exactly what the outcome will be of the revolution that escalated quickly, then—rather than bringing freedom—became a slow burn across the region.

“In the midst of the Arab Spring, there’s been a lot of chaos, but there’s a lot of remaking that comes out of that,” Carson said.

It’s opened access to some places and people but closed some others, he said. And it’s brought freedom to some to make a decision for Christ who might not have had that freedom before.

“I have no wish for them to all be living in famine and war and terror and all those kinds of things,” Carson said. “The price people have paid has been pretty tough. The pain, the trauma is massive. I don’t think we’ve solved those problems yet. I don’t think we’re celebrating a ‘springtime.’ But I do know the Lord will bring peace one day, and my prayer for all of them is that they would find the hope and healing that is found in Christ.”  

Arab Spring: Where are they now?

⁄Tunisia
The Arab Spring was born here when Mohamed Bouazizi lit himself on fire Dec. 17, 2010, in protest of high unemployment, government corruption and a lack of opportunities. He died Jan. 4, 2011, but he had already started a movement. After days of protests and deadly clashes, President Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali— who had held that office since 1987—fled to Saudi Arabia. This fueled other countries in the region to believe they could achieve a similar result, but none came as close as Tunisia to a fresh start. The country has struggled to find a system that works—they’ve had more than 10 governments since the Arab Spring began, and COVID-19 brought on another rough patch. While some observers see their democratic progress as the one real success story of the Arab Spring, others continue to feel the instability more than anything else.

⁄Egypt
Thousands of Egyptians started protesting Jan. 25, a little over a week after Tunisia’s president fled. President Hosni Mubarak—who had been in power since 1981— quickly tried to squelch protests with military force, but on Feb. 11 he stepped down. The younger generation, which had been a driving force behind the politics, celebrated. But the possibility for a new kind of freedom quickly got hijacked by a fight between the military, secular parties and an Islamist movement called the Muslim Brotherhood. After several years of government conflict and ousting leaders, current President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi was elected in 2014. Many say that as a result of his leadership individual freedoms have been even more restricted than they were before the Arab Spring.

⁄Yemen
People in Yemen jumped on board with the idea of revolution in late January 2011, calling for their president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, to step down. Things started nonviolently but then quickly went from bad to worse. As the situation escalated in the capital city of Sanaa, security forces withdrew from the outer parts of the country, allowing rebel forces there to grow stronger. Since 2014, Yemen has been entrenched in a civil war that has produced the world’s largest humanitarian crisis, and millions of children suffer from malnutrition.

⁄Libya
The authoritarian rule of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya was the next to go, as protests started in early February 2011 and turned into a civil war that led to his death and the end of his 42-year rule in August of that year. But it hasn’t been easy for Libyans in the decade since. Conditions in the country have been rough enough that many are still attempting to make the risky boat trip to Europe as refugees. Militia forces have split the country, and human trafficking is a massive problem.

⁄Bahrain
After seeing what happened in Tunisia and Egypt, citizens of Bahrain held an anti-government “Day of Rage” on Feb. 14, 2011. They wanted a new constitution and an elected parliament and eventually called for the ruling Al Khalifa family to be overthrown. But a month later, troops completely shut protests down. Several other countries in the region also experienced short-lived protests that were quickly squelched.

⁄Syria
It started with protests in Syria just like everywhere else, but quickly the country imploded. President Bashar Assad fought back with intense military force, and soon the country was in a civil war fought between Assad, rebel factions and eventually ISIS. Syria became a brutal place to live. At great personal cost people fled the country by the millions, crossing the borders into neighboring countries and traveling by dinghy to Europe. Until Yemen’s war escalated in 2018, it was the largest humanitarian crisis since the end of World War II.

*Compiled from news reports

*Names have been changed.